Restorative Practices in Educational Settings and a Youth Diversion Program: What We Can Learn from One Organization’s Partnerships with the Community to Stem the School-to-Prison Pipeline
By Catherine H. Augustine, Andrea Phillips, Susannah Faxon-Mills, Abigail Kessler
In this report, the authors examine two strategies implemented by the National Conflict Resolution Center (NCRC) to address the school-to-prison pipeline in San Diego County: training educators to use restorative practices and running a program to divert youth from the justice system before charges are filed. The report begins by describing how NCRC became an intermediary focused on supporting at-risk youth in San Diego. It then assesses signs of success and opportunities to improve the implementation of the two NCRC strategies to address the pipeline. It concludes with insights to inform NCRC’s next steps and the field more broadly.
Key Findings
Youth and families most highly valued the diversion program case managers; NCRC provided increasing support to them over time.
At the end of the diversion program, youth and families reported continued disengagement from school. Diversion program leaders might prioritize tutoring or mentoring on educational engagement and achievement.
Youth worried about falling back into old habits after the diversion program ended. Diversion leaders might prioritize preparing families to better support youth after programs end.
Restorative practice coaches described some adults as suspicious of restorative practices. Modeling the practices with adults first helped to increase buy-in for using the practices with students.
Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2024. 43p.