Ethical Humility in Probation
By Frederic G. Reamer
Probation practitioners sometimes face moral uncertainty in their work that requires skilled judgment. These decisions may entail vexing questions about the limits of probationers’ privacy, informed consent protocols, paternalism, compliance with allegedly draconian policies, allocation of limited resources, and whistle-blowing, among others. Especially since the early 1980s, practitioners have been introduced to a wide range of conceptually rich ethical decision-making protocols. Practitioners’ increasingly nuanced grasp of ethical issues reflects the broader expansion of ethics education in the professions generally, including medicine, nursing, psychology, mental health counseling, and marriage and family therapy, among others (Banks, 2012; Barsky, 2019; Council on Social Work Education, 2022; Martin, Vaught and Solomon, 2017; Reamer, 2018a). Core competences related to professional ethics typically address practitioners’ ability to:
make ethical decisions by applying relevant standards, relevant laws and regulations, and models for ethical decision-making
cope with moral ambiguity
use reflection and self-regulation to manage personal values and maintain professionalism
demonstrate professional demeanor in behaviour, appearance, and communication (oral, written, and electronic)
use technology ethically and appropriately to facilitate practice outcomes
use supervision and consultation to guide professional judgment and behaviour.
These core competencies, which are especially relevant to probation, focus primarily on practitioners’ grasp and application of key concepts and decision-making protocols. They also highlight the importance of practitioners’ humility and ‘reflective practice’ when managing ethical issues (Dewayne, 2006; Kaushik, 2017). This Academic Insights paper will explore these concepts further, highlighting the potential benefits for probation practice.
Academic Insights 2023/03; Manchester, UK: HM Inspectorate of Probation 2023. 15p.