Open Access Publisher and Free Library
CRIMINAL JUSTICE.jpeg

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE-CRIMINAL LAW-PROCDEDURE-SENTENCING-COURTS

Posts tagged overcriminalization
Congress Needs to Make Up Its Mind: Mens Rea Reform and Why it Matters

By Rachel Wright 

“There has been an explosion of criminal laws with little accountability. The key to reigning in potential abuse of the criminal legal system is requiring prosecutors to prove state of mind in all crimes.”

KEY POINTS

  • While the number of criminal laws has grown, mens rea requirements have shrunk. This had led to overcriminalization and disparate outcomes.

  • Mens rea reforms have enjoyed bipartisan success in the past and should again in the future.

  • Strengthening mens rea is key to remedying the larger criminal justice issues of overcriminalization and abuse of prosecutorial discretion.

Austin, TX: Right on Crime, 2025. 16p.

link
The Legal Dragnet: Joint Enterprise Law and its Implications

By Nisha Waller

The legal dragnet examines the law and prosecution practice concerning secondary liability, often referred to as 'joint enterprise'. Focusing on homicide cases, it highlights the risks posed by the current ambiguous law and makes a case for creating a safer framework for prosecution.

The report finds joint enterprise laws are vague and wide in scope, causing systemic injustice, including overcriminalisation, over punishment, discriminatory outcomes, and convictions where there is no compelling evidence of intent and a defendant’s physical contribution is minimal.

In particular, the current law:

  • was not ‘fixed’ by the Supreme Court in 2016.

  • does not have clear parameters on secondary parties’ conduct and contribution to an offence.

  • lacks clarity about what counts as assistance and encouragement (the latter in particular).

Under the current vague law, suspects are routinely charged and cases constructed with an absence of rigour, quality, and precision as to the role of each defendant. The law encourages:

  • the police and Crown Prosecution Service to charge suspects based on poor-quality evidence.

  • ‘storytelling’ and highly speculative prosecution case theory to take precedence over strong evidentiary foundations.

  • the use of gang narratives and vague concepts such as ‘in it together’ to construct collective intent. The risks of legal vagueness are particularly borne by young Black men and teenagers, who are most likely to be labelled and stereotyped as gang members.

Given the gravity and long-standing nature of concerns about the current law, the scope of secondary liability law needs to be narrowed in favour of a clearer and safer legal framework. Preventing wrongful convictions and their grave implications should take priority over the ease of prosecution.

The government must make good on their commitment to reform the laws of secondary liability as soon as is practically possible.

A minimum next step is for the government to request a Law Commission review. In addition to legal reform, urgent action is required regarding the various unjust processes that have flourished under the current vague law, highlighted in this report, particularly police and Crown Prosecution Service charging decisions, the overuse and misuse of gang evidence, and speculative and far-reaching prosecution case theory

Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, 2024. 32p.

Download