Open Access Publisher and Free Library
05-Criminal justice.jpg

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CRIMINAL JUSTICE-CRIMINAL LAW-PROCDEDURE-SENTENCING-COURTS

Posts in Social Science
Recruitment and Retention for the Modern Law Enforcement Agency

By The Bureau of Justice Assistance and Office of Community-Oriented Policing Services

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, a tightening labor market, heightened community frustration with the policing profession, and concerns about officer safety and well-being, law enforcement agencies across the country face a historic crisis in recruiting and retaining qualified candidates. SocAs agencies continue to seek innovative ways to attract qualified potential candidates and retain current staff, the crisis demands an immediate and effective response to ensure that law enforcement agencies can maintain staffing levels sufficient to support their communities’ public safety needs. Addressing these issues may necessitate the reexamination of agencies’ foundational organizational structure and processes to more clearly and easily meet the needs and expectations of both law enforcement and the community. In response to this situation and recognizing that the way law enforcement professionals are recruited and retained has a major impact on violent crime reduction, overall public safety, and community trust—Attorney General Merrick Garland identified law enforcement recruitment and retention as a U.S. Department of Justice priority and directed the Office of Justice Programs’ Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) to hold a convening. On April 18, 2023, a group of more than 30 law enforcement and community leaders from across the country met in Washington, D.C., to discuss existing best practices and emerging and transformative solutions designed to address current staffing challenges. In addition to command staff and other law enforcement leaders from key stakeholder associations, other new vocal and innovative leaders were in attendance to assist in designing a national solution. As Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta noted in her opening remarks, the issues of recruitment and retention are among the most important faced by federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies across the nation, regardless of size or location. The agenda was driven by information obtained from the participants during brief interviews conducted before the event and designed to promote meaningful, actionable discussion. This publication represents the outcomes of the convening, focusing on both short-term strategies and long-term solutions identified by participants, who shared examples of streamlining and modernizing the hiring process, incorporating technology, updating requirements, and increasing accessibility; discussed marketing strategies designed to attract service-oriented candidates; examined existing and potentially new benefits and incentives, including a focus on employee wellness and mental well-being, to entice current employees to stay; and addressed the need for transparency and accountability throughout the hiring and employment process to promote public confidence. While there is no one-size-fits-all solution for the law enforcement recruitment and retention challenges, agencies are encouraged to consider adopting strategies contained herein as they pertain to their situations.                                                                                                                                                               

Washington DC:  Bureau of Justice Assistance and Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 2023. 60p.

Hidden Price of Justice: Fines and Fees in DC’s Criminal Legal System

By Michael Johnson, Jr.

The use of criminal legal fines and fees to fill state and local budgetary gaps has deep roots in a history of anti-Black racism. That history is evident in Washington, DC where the regressive nature of these financial obligations and the high costs of incarceration criminalize, extract wealth, and create collateral consequences that disproportionately impact Black and low-income communities. This report details the harms of fines and fees in DC’s criminal legal system, particularly for those unable to pay, and the perverse incentives created by using fines and fees to fund core government services. The authors use interviews with four formerly incarcerated DC residents to highlight the need for systemic reforms and provide recommendations to mitigate these harms in DC.

Key Findings:

  • In federal BOP facilities, people who do not make payments towards their fines lose privileges such as access to commissary spending, denial of higher pay opportunities for work assignments, and denial of drug treatment and community-based programs.

  • D.C residents can be incarcerated for up to a year for unpaid court financial obligations.

  • The DOC and BOP require anyone with outstanding financial obligations to pay their debt in full as a condition of release, and failure to do so can result in re-incarceration.

  • Revenue from Mayor Bowser’s addition of 342 traffic cameras in 2023 is expected to double between fiscal years 2024 and 2025.

  • Criminal fines range from $100 for minor offenses to $125,000 for offenses punishable by 30 years or more.

  • Workers in local DOC facilities earn up to $.50 per hour; a 15-minute phone call is more than double the hourly earnings for someone incarcerated in local DOC facilities.

  • DOC charges a 9 percent surcharge on all commissary goods — on average, generating over $2 million annually between 2018 and 2023. 

  • The work release program in DC requires incarcerated workers to pay fees on their wages, effectively functioning as a 20 percent income tax.

Recommendations:

  • Improve transparency by investing in data systems that can collect, coordinate, and report on criminal fines and fees.

  • Eliminate incarceration and supervision-related fees.

  • Provide economic support for those with criminal legal involvement and their families.

Washington, DC: The DC Fiscal Policy Institute, 2024. 33p.

Wilmington Fines and Fees Task Force Findings and Recommendations

By Wilmington City Council

Lower-income residents in Wilmington face financial hardship as the costs and fees from the city rise. In 2022, the Wilmington City Council created the Fines and Fees Task Force to review fees, fines, and administrative sanctions imposed by all departments and recommend reforms for fairness. The task force found that generating revenue from fees and fines is inefficient and that the city’s financial department expenses, which process tickets, have increased by nearly $7 million over the past 20 years. Additionally, water bill fees have risen significantly, with Wilmington residents covering costs for a neighboring county and the city increasingly using the Water/Sewer Fund to pay for general expenses. With 1 in 4 Wilmington households earning less than $25,000 annually, the city’s reliance on fines and fees disproportionately impacts those least able to pay. The task force recommends revising the city budget to better align revenue sources with the ability to pay.

Key Findings:

  • Most cities, like Wilmington, generate less than 1 percent of their general revenue from fines; in 2022, Wilmington generated 4.4 percent.

  • Wilmington’s revenue from fines and forfeitures rose from 2.8 percent in 2004 to 4.4 percent in 2022.

  • From 2018 to 2022, Wilmington issued over 450,000 parking and red light tickets.

  • From 2018 to 2022, Wilmington issued about $42 million in parking and red-light tickets; nearly 25 percent went uncollected, 50 percent was paid to Conduent for managing the red-light program, and 20 percent went to the parking division.

  • Conduent receives a 30 percent commission on all revenue from booting.

  • In 2022, the city’s Water/Sewer Fund spending on other departments increased by 43 percent, paying $7.5 million in city expenses. 

  • Almost 30 percent of residential water/sewer customers are delinquent on their water bills.

Recommendations:

  • Stop harmful collection practices such as ending the practice of towing and booting cars for delinquent payments and adding penalties to people who can’t pay because of limited income. 

  • Revise vendor contracts to reduce harm and reduce costs.

  • Adjust fees to cover only the costs of providing the service.

Wilmington DE: Wilmington City Council, 2024. 19p.

How Fines and Fees Impact Family Well-Being 

By  Aravind Boddupalli, Susan Nembhard, Michael Karpman, and Sarah Morriss

Fines and fees can impose heavy burdens on those who come into contact with the criminal legal system. Using nationally representative data from the Urban Institute’s 2023 Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey, we examined the prevalence of fines and fees among nonelderly adults’ households, including the types of violations resulting in fines and fees, the populations impacted, and the consequences of these costs. About one in six adults incurred fines and fees in 2023, largely from traffic or parking tickets. Court or incarceration-related fines and fees disproportionately affected people of color and those with low incomes. Compared with adults who only incurred costs from traffic or parking tickets, those with court or incarceration-related fines and fees faced higher amounts charged, greater financial strain to make payments, and a higher likelihood of adverse consequences for being unable to pay, such as driver’s license suspensions, additional fees, or time in jail. They also faced higher rates of food insecurity and other material hardships. Our findings contribute to the growing evidence base on the impacts of fines and fees on family well-being.\

Washington, DC: Tax Policy Center, 2024. 23p.