By Serene C.L. Chng, Salman Saaban, Anongrakh Wechit, Kanitha Krishnasamy

Although the Oriental Magpie-robin Copsychus saularis is still a commonly seen species in many parts of Malaysia, high demand for it as a cage bird domestically and in neighbouring countries has resulted in trapping and smuggling of Malaysian populations. Analysis of seizure data for this species, as it implicated Malaysia, shows an escalation of international trafficking in recent years to feed the persistent demand for the pet trade. Overall, at least 26,950 Oriental Magpie-robins were seized from 44 incidents that implicated Malaysia from January 2015–December 2020, averaging at least 613 birds per seizure. These seizures took place in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Of these, Malaysian and Indonesian authorities definitively reported that 17,314 (64%) birds were being smuggled from Malaysia to Indonesia. This points to Malaysian populations of the Oriental Magpie-robin being increasingly targeted to feed demand in neighbouring countries, particularly Indonesia. At least 17,736 (66%) of all birds were confiscated in just 2020, signifying a current and possibly growing problem. This could be due to an increase in enforcement effort, coupled with dwindling populations in parts of Indonesia to supply birds for trade. A total of 23 seizures occurred in Malaysia, all were confined to the states of Johor, Melaka, Sarawak and Sabah involving a total of 17,997 birds. Most incidents in the first three states pointed to cross-border smuggling (the case in Sabah was a confiscation on premises). In eight of the Malaysian seizures, where birds were being trafficked to Indonesia, at least 16 Indonesian nationals were arrested, strongly suggesting networks of smugglers moving birds between the two countries. Many of these were reported to be illegal immigrants, indicating an additional national security concern.

TRAFFIC, Southeast Asia Regional Office, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia: 2021. 20p.

By Krystof Obidzinski, Agus Andrianto, and Chandra Wijaya

Over the last few years, illegal logging has been at the center of policy debates about the current state and future prospects of Indonesia’s forestry sector. To a significant extent, the policy dialogues as well as public understanding of the illegal logging problem have been influenced by the timber establishment’s view that clandestine timber smuggling is responsible for illegal logging activities in the country. Echoing this sentiment, the Indonesian government has been at odds with neighboring countries Malaysia and Singapore over their perceived lack of cooperation in stemming the illegal flow of Indonesian timber across the border and thus helping to rein in illegal logging. At the same time, timber smuggling has become the focus of forest law enforcement operations in Indonesia. This paper scrutinizes the assumption that timber smuggling is at the core of the illegal logging problem in Indonesia. Taking the border zone between Indonesia and Malaysia on the island of Borneo (Kalimantan) as a sample unit of analysis and complementing it with data from other parts of Indonesia, the paper shows the intensity of timber smuggling was relatively high between 2000 and 2003, but has since declined by over 70%. Despite this decline, illegal logging in Indonesia still continues at a rate of approximately 40 million m3 per year. It seems clear that timber smuggling is not the primary driver of illegal logging in Indonesia. Instead, the core of the problem is the extraction of timber by Indonesian forest concession holders, plantation developers, road construction companies and other ventures that abuse company permits and violate prevailing forestry regulations.

Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research, 2006. 46p.