Track, harass, repeat: Investigating attitudes that normalise tech-based coercive control

By Office of the eSafety Commissioner (Australia)

Coercive control is a pattern of abusive behaviour used to control someone within a relationship through manipulation, pressure and fear. It’s not one behaviour or incident, but a pattern of controlling behaviour.

This summary report explores attitudes and expectations that could normalise the use of tech-based coercive control in relationships.

People who use coercive control in a relationship are more likely to use physical violence against their partner and any children involved, and there is a greater risk of physical harm, including intimate partner homicide.

When someone uses digital technology as part of that abusive behaviour, it’s known as ‘technology-facilitated coercive control’ or ‘tech-based coercive control’. This can include behaviours such as monitoring and surveillance, cyberstalking with tracking, impersonation, hacking, harassment and abuse. It is often subtle and targeted and this can make it difficult to identify.

The research aims to understand the prevalence of certain harmful expectations and attitudes relating to tech-based surveillance and micro-management (often elements of tech-based coercive control) in intimate relationships.

The findings highlight the need for nuanced and targeted education and communication activities to:

increase awareness of tech-based coercive control

reshape how people think about digital privacy and respect in digital environments when in an intimate relationship

reinforce that consent is an active and ongoing process.

Key findings

Men, younger adults and linguistically diverse adults were more likely to agree with behaviours that could foster an unhealthy dependency or controlling dynamic within intimate relationships.

Men and linguistically diverse adults were more likely to agree that insisting on checking how an intimate partner looks in a photo, wanting them to be constantly available to respond to the partner’s texts and calls, and constantly texting them were all usually a sign of care from a partner within an intimate relationship.

Men, linguistically diverse adults and married adults were more likely to agree that, within an intimate relationship, it was reasonable for a partner to expect to have their partner’s personal passwords and to track them whenever they wanted.

Canberra: Australian Government, 2025. 23p.