By Alexandre Dumas (Author), G. Staal (Illustrator), J.A. Beauce (Illustrator), & 2more Format: Kindle Edition

Few novels have captured the imagination of readers across generations as powerfully as The Count of Monte Cristo. First published in 1844, this sweeping tale of betrayal, revenge, and redemption is the work of Alexandre Dumas, one of France’s most celebrated literary figures. Set against the backdrop of post-Napoleonic France, the novel follows the transformation of Edmond Dantès, a young sailor whose promising future is shattered by the treachery of those he trusted. Wrongfully imprisoned in the Château d’If, Dantès emerges years later not as the man he once was, but as the enigmatic and wealthy Count of Monte Cristo—determined to exact justice on those who wronged him. At once a thrilling adventure and a profound exploration of human nature, The Count of Monte Cristodelves into themes of vengeance, justice, mercy, and the enduring power of hope. Dumas weaves a rich tapestry of characters and subplots, each contributing to the novel’s intricate moral landscape. His storytelling is both grand in scope and intimate in detail, offering readers a journey that is as emotionally resonant as it is exhilarating.
This two volume edition is based on the five volume 1888 English edition. It retains all text as in the original and includes most of the illustrations preserving the spirit and elegance of Dumas’s original edition, while making the novel accessible to contemporary readers. This version is most likely that of an anonymous translator who translated the work from the French for the publisher Chapman and Hall in 1846. There have been many translations in dozens of languages, and some in the 20th century basically rewriting the novel in modern prose and almost always considerably abridged.

Read-Me.Org Inc. New York-Philadelphia-Australia. 2025. 501 p.

By Alexandre Dumas (Author), G. Staal (Illustrator), J.A. Beauce (Illustrator), & 2more Format: Kindle Edition

Few novels have captured the imagination of readers across generations as powerfully as The Count of Monte Cristo. First published in 1844, this sweeping tale of betrayal, revenge, and redemption is the work of Alexandre Dumas, one of France’s most celebrated literary figures. Set against the backdrop of post-Napoleonic France, the novel follows the transformation of Edmond Dantès, a young sailor whose promising future is shattered by the treachery of those he trusted. Wrongfully imprisoned in the Château d’If, Dantès emerges years later not as the man he once was, but as the enigmatic and wealthy Count of Monte Cristo—determined to exact justice on those who wronged him. At once a thrilling adventure and a profound exploration of human nature, The Count of Monte Cristodelves into themes of vengeance, justice, mercy, and the enduring power of hope. Dumas weaves a rich tapestry of characters and subplots, each contributing to the novel’s intricate moral landscape. His storytelling is both grand in scope and intimate in detail, offering readers a journey that is as emotionally resonant as it is exhilarating.
This two volume edition is based on the five volume 1888 English edition. It retains all text as in the original and includes most of the illustrations preserving the spirit and elegance of Dumas’s original edition, while making the novel accessible to contemporary readers. This version is most likely that of an anonymous translator who translated the work from the French for the publisher Chapman and Hall in 1846. There have been many translations in dozens of languages, and some in the 20th century basically rewriting the novel in modern prose and almost always considerably abridged.

Read-Me.Org Inc. New York-Philadelphia-Australia. 2025. 456 p.

By Paul McGorrery

In sentencing an offender, courts take many factors into account, such as the seriousness of the offence, the offender’s prior record, their age, whether they pleaded guilty and many others. In Australia, courts do this through an approach known as instinctive synthesis, meaning they consider all the factors that can justify a sentence being more or less severe and then arrive at a final outcome. One of the factors that courts may take into account is whether the offender has already been punished in some fashion outside the criminal justice process. Known as extra-curial punishment3 (or extra judicial or natural5 punishment) this can take various forms such as visa cancellation,6 loss of chosen career, injury to the offender8 and hardship to the offender’s family. This report is concerned with just one form of extra-curial punishment: adverse media coverage, in particular, of people. The media and the courts have an important and symbiotic relationship, but sometimes their interests can diverge. The media have an interest in reporting on criminal justice matters because they are often stories of considerable interest to their audiences. In reporting on those stories, the media often concentrate their attentions ‘on the exceptional and unusual among serious crimes’, which can lead to ‘intense and often emotive media reporting’ about sentencing. This can run the risk of undermining, rather than promoting, confidence in the justice system.

Courts in turn have an interest in having their decisions reported. Confidence in the judicial arm of the criminal justice system relies on a combination of community awareness about what courts do, the transparency of their work, and the apparent fairness of their decisions, which can only be scrutinised if there is transparency and community awareness. Moreover, the sentencing purpose of general deterrence – whereby the sentencing of one offender is thought to deter other people from engaging in similar behaviour – is realistically only achievable (if at all) if the media and/or government operate as the conduit between the courts and the community. While some courts have taken the very laudable step of making most of their sentencing remarks publicly available, many people do not even have time to read media summaries, let alone original source material like sentencing remarks, especially in the social media age. So the community realistically only becomes aware of sentencing decisions through the media. The difficulty is balancing the need for fair coverage (the courts’ priority) with the need for interesting coverage (the media’s priority). Justice Harper has described the relationship as like a ‘Greek tragedy’ because ‘[e]ach is forced by its circumstances to face the other off, with neither having the flexibility necessary to reach a satisfactory working compromise’.

Malbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council (VIC), 2022. 24p.

By Dimitri A. Bogazianos

In 2010, President Barack Obama signed a law repealing one of the most controversial policies in American criminal justice history: the one hundred to one sentencing disparity between crack cocaine and powder whereby someone convicted of “simply” possessing five grams of crack—the equivalent of a few sugar packets—had been required by law to serve no less than five years in prison. In this highly original work, Dimitri A. Bogazianos draws on various sources to examine the profound symbolic consequences of America’s reliance on this punishment structure, tracing the rich cultural linkages between America’s War on Drugs, and the creative contributions of those directly affected by its destructive effects.

Focusing primarily on lyrics that emerged in 1990s New York rap, which critiqued the music industry for being corrupt, unjust, and criminal, Bogazianos shows how many rappers began drawing parallels between the “rap game” and the “crack game." He argues that the symbolism of crack in rap’s stance towards its own commercialization represents a moral debate that is far bigger than hip hop culture, highlighting the degree to which crack cocaine—although a drug long in decline—has come to represent the entire paradoxical predicament of punishment in the U.S. today.

New York; London: NYU Press, 2011. 216p.